- Posts: 634
- Thank you received: 0
GKP
Less
More
11 years 6 months ago - 11 years 6 months ago #11040
by WaveSurfer
Replied by WaveSurfer on topic GKP
lower targets remain in tact - which are 60/63p, 54/57p & 44/46p area. must break 73p 1st tho
psyurmh wrote: Hi WS
Does this mean that we should be targeting the 55p area rather than the 61p previously mentioned by various people?
Thanks
Last edit: 11 years 6 months ago by WaveSurfer.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 519
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 6 months ago #11042
by Food4Thought
Replied by Food4Thought on topic GKP
Hi WS,
can I ask you how you create your extrapolated lines, both the trendlines and projected line within.
Ta
F4T
can I ask you how you create your extrapolated lines, both the trendlines and projected line within.
Ta
F4T
The following user(s) said Thank You: KoolKeith
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 6 months ago #11043
by redchilly
Long @ 77.50
SL is below 73.50
Not a Buy advice as GKP is far from an established uptrend
Its purely day trade
I will be in & out quickly
Take profit order is at 89
Will post a chart later
SL is below 73.50
Not a Buy advice as GKP is far from an established uptrend
Its purely day trade
I will be in & out quickly
Take profit order is at 89
Will post a chart later
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 6 months ago #11046
by redchilly
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 6 months ago #11048
by KoolKeith
WS...
Just thinking, on your projected counts down within the green wedge, your projected wave 3 is way shorter than wave 1. 3 should always be longer than 1 so.... it should almost be where you have projected 5. Not sure how this can be. Are you using fibs or is it just a rough approximation?
Thanks in advance
Just thinking, on your projected counts down within the green wedge, your projected wave 3 is way shorter than wave 1. 3 should always be longer than 1 so.... it should almost be where you have projected 5. Not sure how this can be. Are you using fibs or is it just a rough approximation?
Thanks in advance
The following user(s) said Thank You: Food4Thought
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 634
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 6 months ago - 11 years 6 months ago #11053
by WaveSurfer
Replied by WaveSurfer on topic GKP
Hi KK,
Its a diagonal triangle that im looking at, some call it wedge...2 converging tl's and formation of waves within 3-3-3-3-3 (5 waves) overlapping. usually occurs during a strong downtrend ABC correction and potentially signalling and end of the trend in the ABC(maybe)...
With regards to your question of 3 shorter than 1 etc... well 3 can be be shorter than 1, 3 cannot be shortest wave as part of the impulsive waves which are 1,3 ,5.
The target of move is based in fib and currently while price remains with in parameters, i have no option but to consider the probabilities of this move, will it happen, we just have to monitor and assess.
In the meantime price has hit a range 64/54 p (esp if 118p got taken out)range projected many moons ago for potential completion of this correction, we are in that range now.. its been one hell of a down trend.
Regards,
WS
Its a diagonal triangle that im looking at, some call it wedge...2 converging tl's and formation of waves within 3-3-3-3-3 (5 waves) overlapping. usually occurs during a strong downtrend ABC correction and potentially signalling and end of the trend in the ABC(maybe)...
With regards to your question of 3 shorter than 1 etc... well 3 can be be shorter than 1, 3 cannot be shortest wave as part of the impulsive waves which are 1,3 ,5.
The target of move is based in fib and currently while price remains with in parameters, i have no option but to consider the probabilities of this move, will it happen, we just have to monitor and assess.
In the meantime price has hit a range 64/54 p (esp if 118p got taken out)range projected many moons ago for potential completion of this correction, we are in that range now.. its been one hell of a down trend.
Regards,
WS
Last edit: 11 years 6 months ago by WaveSurfer.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.238 seconds
